Is a QUICKIE, good filler?
August 26th 2007 04:24
Time for a QUICK blast-off... - image courtesy of NASA
There never seem to be enough hours on the clock to get through the to-do list, let alone time to do the things that we really want to do. Many couples battle with this – feeling time is the come-between them and all things. The time spent together doing certain activities particularly of the intimate kind can take up to an average of 30 minutes.
Now what if you don’t have 30 minutes to spare? Would a quickie prove satisfactory?
“Intimacy no matter how long it takes or how quick it is, is always better than none,” an enthusiastic Joe said. “Quickies are great as it keeps us both satisfied for the time being, and keeps us wanting more. So by the time we get to do a proper one, it’s sweet…!”
Cat the ever-romantic one doesn’t tolerate quickies. She likes dressing for it, and enjoys how her partner casts off each garment in a slow sensual performance. “The entire sexual act is all encompassing. I like it when each of us have had time to enjoy it,” she added.
While quickies are great when you don’t have much time on your hands. Some of us just don’t perform under such time restraint. Perhaps it’s a gentle problem of mind over matter, but when you know you have to achieve that big 'O' in a few minutes…it can just gently reduce the initial excitement.
Nick and his fiancée currently have crazy work schedules leaving them very little time during the week to be intimate. Apart from work stress, the stress of a quickie, sometimes leave him with less than perfectly formed equipment. “The trick we’ve found to work is not thinking that it is a quickie, but just that we’re going though the motions a little quicker than usual!”
I personally am not too keen on a quickie. I think the romantic in me likes it to be a play rather than an act from a play… What do you think – is a quickie better than nothing? How can you turn a quickie into just as good as the *full-blown*?
There never seem to be enough hours on the clock to get through the to-do list, let alone time to do the things that we really want to do. Many couples battle with this – feeling time is the come-between them and all things. The time spent together doing certain activities particularly of the intimate kind can take up to an average of 30 minutes.
Now what if you don’t have 30 minutes to spare? Would a quickie prove satisfactory?
“Intimacy no matter how long it takes or how quick it is, is always better than none,” an enthusiastic Joe said. “Quickies are great as it keeps us both satisfied for the time being, and keeps us wanting more. So by the time we get to do a proper one, it’s sweet…!”
Cat the ever-romantic one doesn’t tolerate quickies. She likes dressing for it, and enjoys how her partner casts off each garment in a slow sensual performance. “The entire sexual act is all encompassing. I like it when each of us have had time to enjoy it,” she added.
While quickies are great when you don’t have much time on your hands. Some of us just don’t perform under such time restraint. Perhaps it’s a gentle problem of mind over matter, but when you know you have to achieve that big 'O' in a few minutes…it can just gently reduce the initial excitement.
Nick and his fiancée currently have crazy work schedules leaving them very little time during the week to be intimate. Apart from work stress, the stress of a quickie, sometimes leave him with less than perfectly formed equipment. “The trick we’ve found to work is not thinking that it is a quickie, but just that we’re going though the motions a little quicker than usual!”
I personally am not too keen on a quickie. I think the romantic in me likes it to be a play rather than an act from a play… What do you think – is a quickie better than nothing? How can you turn a quickie into just as good as the *full-blown*?
| 107 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog



























Comment by James Rickard
unlucky_ fishermen.com
Angling Fish
Check this out...
I personally am not too keen on a quickie. I think the romantic in me likes it to be a play rather than an act from a play…
I agree. Now and then, it may be good but, a steady diet of quickies get old!
Comment by Always Eighteen
Always Eighteen
Comment by charliesgirl_992000
Histeries, Mysteries and what not
Lifes little slices
Mystical Creativity
Oh yeah, quickies can be GREAT fun too and hubby and i have lots of them. <softsmile>
Tammy
Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
Comment by Ash
Flashes of memories
Although the excitement of a quickie can be just as good as the slower, more romantic moments I`m not a huge fan of them if they happen too often.
Interesting question you pose!
Ash
Comment by Lara M
Love Speaks
Food Slate
I agree, James -- a diet of quickies is too *skinny* <giggle>...
Ooooh, Tammy -- ok, I get what u mean
Comment by Lara M
Love Speaks
Food Slate
Yea, I'm with you on this, Ash. Though I can see how exciting a quickie can be...I'm not too convinced yet.
Being sooo time-poor these days, my friends and I were wondering what other people thought about it and how they managed it
Comment by charliesgirl_992000
Histeries, Mysteries and what not
Lifes little slices
Mystical Creativity
Tammy
Comment by Aimzster
Reality TV
The Jeepney Stop
First Time Mum
Comment by Lara M
Love Speaks
Food Slate
Ok, Aimzster...I agree that spending whatever time there is, is better than none
Interesting that some many people feel so positive about QUICKIES